Many of you have probably seen this political commercial:
It combines an interview with a lady who lost her house to foreclosure with some shots of John McCain’s multimillion dollar properties of which he has several. For a good measure they also throw in some of his quotes where he says that people in this predicament acted irresponsibly and it’s not up to the responsible ones to bail them out.
I carefully listened to the lady who stated that her interest rate went up to 15.75% and her mortgage payment was $2,400 while her take-home pay was $2,200, so obviously she couldn’t keep up with the payments and lost her house. The viewer is prompted to compare and contrast her not being able to make ends meet with McCain’s lavish lifestyle complete with personal jet which his wife picked up so he can fly around in comfort. Instead I’d like to attract the viewer’s attention to why the homeless lady ended up without a house.
I purchased my new townhouse about the same time. My interest rate is 5.125% and will stay that way for 30 years. I did not have any down payment. My mortgage payment is $780/month which I should be able to afford even on unemployment (in KS it’s over $400/week). The most important part is that I still have the house, despite McCain family efforts to buy up all the available real estate.
So what’s the difference between me and the lady who “feels that she didn’t act irresponsibly”? It’s simple: when I was looking for a house I picked a smaller, cheaper townhouse in a not-so-fancy suburb and paid for it with the 30 year fixed mortgage. My house appreciated moderately and I am paying less than it costs to rent similar space. On the other hand, the lady who wants me to feel sorry for her, bought a house she knew she couldn’t afford, so she had to go with one of the “creative mortgage products” and gambled that in five years her house will appreciate enough to refinance it and keep the payments in line. I am pretty sure that’s what mortgage brokers were telling everyone at that time. I am also sure that she knew about upcoming interest and payment resets but ignored it because everyone was doing it. Now, when her gamble didn’t pay off and her house was taken back by the bank she wants everyone to share her pain. I personally don’t feel sorry for her. She lived in a nice house for 5 years paying less than she would have paid for rent. The foreclosure will eventually be erased and she will be ready to do something stupid and irresponsible again. It’s not McCain’s fault and the way to fix it is not to vote in a candidate who will confiscate money from the people who didn’t bite on attractive scam or from people who made it, like McCain’s wife. It’s not my responsibility to help stupid people. There are exceptions in life when something happens, like sickness or death in the family, where some relief may be warranted. Otherwise, I don’t have any spare change.
Disclaimer: I personally think that both candidates will be bad for the country so I don’t support either. The advertisement ends with the words “pssst… Do something”, so I thought I’d do something and point out the bullshit in it.


10 responses so far ↓
1
emawkc
// Aug 19, 2008 at 8:36 pm
You may be misinterpreting the intent of the ad, which is simply for the Obama camp to say that if you have lost your house to foreclosure, Obama will use taxpayer money to get it back for you (or buy you a new one) and McCain won’t.
It’s a not so subtle attempt to by votes from stupid people.
2
Melinda
// Aug 19, 2008 at 8:41 pm
Damn Meesha, I never knew you to be so political. I learn something new everyday. And regardless of the ad, you are spot on with the stupidity of people. Status quo and greed have screwed people over.
3
The D
// Aug 19, 2008 at 9:06 pm
Consumer: “WHAAAAA! I made a stupid choice and now I want the government to bale me out!
This is just like those morons that thought they could get a car for 49 bucks from Chad Franklin. Have you been watching these reports on 41? Now they will get bailed out because they are stupid. What did they think would happen?
And Emaw is right Obama is going to raise your taxes so much you, or I, won’t be able to make our mortgage payments.
4
m.v.
// Aug 19, 2008 at 9:07 pm
Emaw- if they have an ad saying that they will let me pick the house I like and they will kick the previous owner out AND let me keep his super-model wife - they have my vote. No way McCain can match that.
Melinda- I just have a hard time believing that people buy this crap.
5
m.v.
// Aug 19, 2008 at 9:09 pm
D- but Obama will let you find and then gay-marry your roommate so you can get the tax break.
6
Joe
// Aug 20, 2008 at 7:42 am
I’m right with you on this one, Meesha. It pisses me off to see my tax dollars (of which I pay waaaay too much) going to bail out gamblers who sevened out when the gambled on this housing bullshit.
7
Bull E. Vard
// Aug 20, 2008 at 9:36 am
This is the kind of crap that keeps me voting for 3rd party candidates. The major parties are only for panderers and voting for one of them is very similar to being a sheep.
8
Burrowowl
// Aug 20, 2008 at 8:06 pm
Yeah, McCain would rather have your tax money bail out the banks. They’re both looking to buy votes.
9
Faith
// Aug 21, 2008 at 1:30 pm
Sometimes, you kick ass Meesha. (Just sometimes. Don’t go getting all Tony-headed on us, or anything…)
10
m.v.
// Aug 21, 2008 at 1:40 pm
Thank you Faith, don’t worry, I mostly post original content so to be like TKC I have to have my own pictures of semi-naked women to post. On the other hand, if I had semi-naked (or even dressed) women close enough to take their pictures I wouldn’t be here blogging. So far it hasn’t been a concern.
Leave a Comment